Compare/exchangerate.dev vs Fixer
Comparison

exchangerate.dev vs Fixer

For programmatic, reproducible market data, exchangerate.dev wins on provenance, price, and time-to-first-call. A fixer still leads if you need a manned terminal with news, chat, and execution in one seat.

Last reviewed Jun 2026 · we update this page when either product ships material changes.
exchangerate.devBest for builders
A programmatic data API. Point-in-time by default, every value sourced, public pricing.
From $0 · free tier, no card
Get API key
FixerIncumbent
A manned terminal: data plus news, messaging, and execution in a single desktop seat.
From quote-based · annual seat license
Visit site

Feature by feature

Capabilityexchangerate.devFixer
Point-in-time history✓ Yesmanual
Per-value source provenance✓ Yes✗ No
REST + WebSocket API✓ Yesterminal only
Public, per-call pricing✓ Yesquote-based
Free tier✓ Yes✗ No
One schema across fx · metals · power✓ Yessiloed
CSV / Parquet export✓ Yeslimited
Time to first callminutesweeks

Where exchangerate.dev wins

If your data flows into code — backtests, pipelines, dashboards — exchangerate.dev fits the way you already work. Point-in-time history is default, every value names its source, and you can start free in minutes with public, per-call pricing.

Where fixer leads

If you need a person at a desk with breaking news, dealer chat, and order execution beside the numbers, a terminal still does more in one seat. exchangerate.dev is data infrastructure, not a trading cockpit.

Verdict

Choose exchangerate.dev when reproducibility, automation, and cost matter more than a manned interface. Keep fixer for the desk that needs news, chat, and execution together. Many teams run both — exchangerate.dev feeds the models, the terminal sits with the trader.

Related comparisons

Compareexchangerate.dev vs scraped feedsRead Compareexchangerate.dev vs spreadsheet exportsRead GuideMigrating a backtest off restated dataRead